Correlation Between Volume and Pressure of Intracranial Space With Craniectomy Surface Area and Brain Herniation: A Phantom-Based Study.

There are proponents of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and its various modifications who claim reasonable clinical outcomes for each of them. Clinical outcome in cases of traumatic brain injury, managed conservatively or aided by different surgical techniques, depends on multiple factors, which vary widely among patients and have complex interplay, making it difficult to compare one case with another in absolute terms. This forms the basis of the perceived necessity to have a standard model to study, compare, and strategize in this field. We designed a phantom-based model and present the findings of the study aimed at establishing a correlation of the volume of intracranial space and changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) with surface area of the craniectomy defect created during DC and brain herniation volume. A roughly hemispherical radio-opaque container was scanned on a 128-slice computed tomography scanner. Craniectomies of different sizes and shapes were marked on the walls of the phantom. Two spherical sacs of stretchable materials were subsequently placed inside the phantom, fixed to three-way connectors, filled with water, and connected with transducers. The terminals of the transducer cables were coupled with the display monitor through a signal amplifier and processor module. Parts of the wall of the phantom were removed to let portions of the sac herniate through the defect, simulating a DC. Volume measurements using AW volume share 7® software were done. Resection of a 12.7 × 11.5 cm part of the wall resulted in a 10-cm-diameter defect in the wall. Volume differential of 35 mL created a midline shift of 5 mm to the side with lesser volume. When measuring pressure in two stretchable sacs contained inside the phantom, there always remained a pressure differential ranging from 1 to 2 mm Hg in different recordings, even with sacs on both sides containing an equal volume of fluids. Creating a circular wall defect of 10 cm in diameter with an intracavitary pressure of 35 mm Hg on the ipsilateral sac and 33 mm on the contralateral sac recorded with intact walls, resulted in a true volume expansion of 48.411 cm3. The herniation resulted in a reduction of pressure in both sacs, with the pressure recorded as 25 mm in the ipsilateral sac and 24 mm in the contralateral sac. The findings closely matched those of the other model-based studies. Refinement of the materials used is likely to provide a valid platform to study cranial volume, ICP, craniectomy size, and brain prolapse volume in real time. The model will help in pre-operatively choosing the most appropriate technique between a classical DC, a hinge craniotomy, and an expansive cranioplasty technique in cases of refractory raised ICP.

Establishment of a model to predict mortality after decompression craniotomy for traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is still high even while undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC), and the expensive treatment costs bring huge economic burden to the families of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify preoperative indicators that influence patient outcomes and to develop a risk model for predicting patient mortality by a retrospective analysis of TBI patients undergoing DC. METHODS: A total of 288 TBI patients treated with DC, admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical School from August 2015 to April 2021, were used for univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for death after DC in TBI patients. We also built a risk model for the identified risk factors and conducted internal verification and model evaluation. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis identified four risk factors: Glasgow Coma Scale, age, activated partial thrombin time, and mean CT value of the superior sagittal sinus. These risk factors can be obtained before DC. In addition, we also developed a 3-month mortality risk model and conducted a bootstrap 1000 resampling internal validation, with C-indices of 0.852 and 0.845, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a risk model that has clinical significance for the early identification of patients who will still die after DC. Interestingly, we also identified a new early risk factor for TBI patients after DC, that is, preoperative mean CT value of the superior sagittal sinus (p < .05).

Comparing surgical outcomes: Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy in acute subdural hematoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Acute subdural hematomas (SDH) pose a significant health risk, often resulting from traumatic head injuries. The choice between surgical interventions, craniotomy, and decompressive craniectomy, remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes and guide clinical decision-making. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane, up to December 2023. Selection criteria included studies comparing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute SDH. Data extraction utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Tool, and statistical analysis employed the random-effects model. Results: The meta-analysis included 17 studies and 6848 patients. Craniotomy demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality rates (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89, P < 0.0001). GCS scores favored craniotomy for severe cases. GOS outcomes showed a trend favoring craniotomy, particularly in good recovery (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04-1.74, P = 0.03). Additional factors explored included co-existing sub-epidural hematoma, mydriasis, extracranial injuries, residual SDH, revision rates, and intracranial pressure. Conclusion: The meta-analysis suggests that craniotomy may be a favorable surgical strategy for acute SDH, displaying a significant decrease in mortality rates and a lower risk of raised intracranial pressure. However, the nuanced nature of outcomes emphasizes the need for a tailored approach, considering broader clinical contexts. Future research should address limitations and provide a basis for well-informed clinical decision-making.

Decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) reduces mortality without increasing the risk of very severe disability among patients with life-threatening massive cerebral infarction. However, its efficacy was demonstrated before the era of endovascular thrombectomy trials. It remains uncertain whether DC improves the prognosis of patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction receiving endovascular therapy. METHODS: We pooled data from two trials (DEVT and RESCUE BT studies in China) and patients with malignant MCA infarction were included to assess outcomes and heterogeneity of DC therapy effect. Patients with herniation were dichotomized into DC and conservative groups according to their treatment strategy. The primary outcome was the rate of mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included disability level at 90 days as measured by the modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) and quality-of-life score. The associations of DC with clinical outcomes were performed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 98 patients with herniation, 37 received DC surgery and 61 received conservative treatment. The median (interquartile range) was 70 (62-76) years and 40.8% of the patients were women. The mortality rate at 90 days was 59.5% in the DC group compared with 85.2% in the conservative group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.94]; P=0.04). There were 21.6% of patients in the DC group and 6.6% in the conservative group who had a mRS score of 4 (moderately severe disability); and 10.8% and 4.9%, respectively, had a score of 5 (severe disability). The quality-of-life score was higher in the DC group (0.00 [0.00-0.14] vs 0.00 [0.00-0.00], P=0.004), but DC treatment was not associated with better quality-of-life score in multivariable analyses (adjusted ß Coefficient, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.08-0.11]; p=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: DC was associated with decreased mortality among patients with malignant MCA infarction who received endovascular therapy. The majority of survivors remained moderately severe disability and required improvement on quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DEVT trial: http://www.chictr.org. Identifier, ChiCTR-IOR-17013568. The RESCUE BT trial: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Identifier, ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Long-term results of minimally invasive strip craniectomy without helmet therapy for scaphocephaly - a single-centre experience.

Scaphocephaly is the most common type of craniosynostosis and various surgical techniques are used for treatment. Due to late postoperative changes of the head shape, long-term outcome data is important for evaluating any new surgical technique. At our institution, minimally invasive strip craniectomy without regular helmet therapy is the standard treatment in scaphocephalic patients. Between October 2021 and February 2023, we retrospectively examined the skull shape of patients who underwent minimally invasive strip craniectomy for scaphocephaly using a 3D surface scan technique. The cephalic index (CI), the need for helmet therapy and additional cosmetic outcome parameters were investigated. We included 70 patients (72.5% male). The mean follow-up time was 46 (10-125) months and the mean CI was 75.7 (66.7-85.2). In 58 patients, the final cosmetic result was rated as "excellent/good" (mean CI: 76.3; 70.4-85.0), in 11 as "intermediate" (mean CI: 73.3; 66.7-77.6), and in one case as "unsatisfactory" (CI 69.3). The presence of a suboccipital protrusion was associated with a "less than good" outcome. The CI correlated significantly with the overall outcome, the presence of frontal bossing, and the interval between scan and surgery (age at scan). Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is an elegant and safe method to correct scaphocephaly. Our data show good cosmetic results in the long term even without regular postoperative helmet therapy.

Paradoxical herniation associated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy after decompressive craniectomy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Whether hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can cause paradoxical herniation is still unclear. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old patient who was comatose due to brain trauma underwent decompressive craniotomy and gradually regained consciousness after surgery. HBOT was administered 22 d after surgery due to speech impairment. Paradoxical herniation appeared on the second day after treatment, and the patient's condition worsened after receiving mannitol treatment at the rehabilitation hospital. After timely skull repair, the paradoxical herniation was resolved, and the patient regained consciousness and had a good recovery as observed at the follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Paradoxical herniation is rare and may be caused by HBOT. However, the underlying mechanism is unknown, and the understanding of this phenomenon is insufficient. The use of mannitol may worsen this condition. Timely skull repair can treat paradoxical herniation and prevent serious complications.

Trends and Predictors of Decompressive Craniectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2011-2020.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have been reported to decline over time, attributed to an increase in endovascular therapy (EVT) preventing the development of malignant cerebral edema. We sought to characterize trends in DC in AIS between 2011 and 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of U.S. AIS hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample, 2011 to 2020. We calculated rates of DC per 10,000 AIS among all AIS hospitalizations, as well as AIS hospitalizations undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). A logistic regression to determine predictors of DC was performed. RESULTS: Of ∼4.4 million AIS hospitalizations, 0.5% underwent DC; of ∼300,000 AIS with IMV, 5.8% underwent DC. From 2011 to 2020, the rate of DC increased from 37.4 to 59.1 per 10,000 AIS (p<0.001). The rate of DC in patients undergoing IMV remained stable at ∼550 per 10,000 (p=0.088). The most important factors predicting DC were age (OR 4.88, 95% CI 4.53-5.25), hospital stroke volume (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.17-3.14), hospital teaching status (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.36-1.75), and transfer status (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.41-1.66); EVT status did not predict DC. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of DC in AIS has increased between 2011 and 2020. Our findings are contrary to prior reports of decreasing DC rates over time. Increasing EVT rates do not seem to be preventing the occurrence of DC. Future research should focus on the decision-making process for both clinicians and surrogates regarding DC with consideration of long-term outcomes.

Emergent Management of Severe Hypothermia, Acidemia, and Coagulopathy in Operative Penetrating Ballistic Cranial Trauma.

Hypothermia in a trauma patient has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality and is more frequently seen in those sustaining traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Acidosis is an important consequence of hypothermia that leads to derangements across the spectrum of the coagulation cascade. Here, we present a case of a 31-year-old male presented after suffering a right parietal penetrating ballistic injury with an associated subdural hematoma and 7 mm midline shift requiring decompressive craniectomy and external ventricular drain (EVD) placement in the setting of severe hypothermia (28°C) and acidosis (pH 7.12). With aggressive rewarming intraoperatively, the use of full-body forced-air warming, warmed IV fluids, and increasing the ambient room temperature, the patient's acidosis and hypothermia improved to pH 7.20 and 34°C. Despite these aggressive attempts to rewarm the patient, he developed coagulopathy in the setting of concurrent hypothermia and acidosis. This case highlights the importance of prompt reversal of hypothermia due to its potentially fatal effects, particularly in the setting of severe TBIs. We discuss the critical aspects of surgical management of the injury and anesthetic management of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy perioperatively.

Innovative Solutions for Patients Who Undergo Craniectomy: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a widely used procedure to alleviate high intracranial pressure. Multidisciplinary teams have designed and implemented external medical prototypes to improve patient life quality and avoid complications following DC in patients awaiting cranioplasty (CP), including 3D printing and plaster prototypes when available. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to understand the extent and type of evidence about innovative external prototypes for patients who undergo DC while awaiting CP. METHODS: This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This scoping review will include noninvasive medical devices for adult patients who undergo DC while waiting for CP. The search strategy will be implemented in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health Index Medicus. Patent documents were also allocated in Espacenet, Google Patents, and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) database. RESULTS: This scoping review is not subject to ethical approval as there will be no involvement of patients. The dissemination plan includes publishing the review findings in a peer-reviewed journal and presenting results at conferences that engage the most pertinent stakeholders in innovation and neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review will serve as a baseline to provide evidence for multidisciplinary teams currently designing these noninvasive innovations to reduce the risk of associated complications after DC, hoping that more cost-effective models can be implemented, especially in low- and middle-income countries. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/50647.

Customised pre-operative cranioplasty to achieve maximal surgical resection of tumours with osseous involvement-a case series.

PURPOSE: Surgical resection with bony margins would be the treatment of choice for tumours with osseous involvement such as meningiomas and metastasis. By developing and designing pre-operative customised 3D modelled implants, the patient can undergo resection of meningioma and repair of bone defect in the same operation. We present a generalisable method for designing pre-operative cranioplasty in patients to repair the bone defect after the resection of tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included six patients who presented with a tumour that was associated with overlying bone involvement. They underwent placement of customised cranioplasty in the same setting. A customised implant using a pre-operative imaging was designed with a 2-cm margin to allow for any intra-operative requirements for extending the craniectomy. RESULTS: Six patients were evaluated in this case series. Four patients had meningiomas, 1 patient had metastatic breast cancer on final histology, and 1 patient was found to have an intra-osseous arteriovenous malformation. Craniectomy based on margins provided by a cutting guide was fashioned. After tumour removal and haemostasis, the cranioplasty was then placed. All patients recovered well post-operatively with satisfactory cosmetic results. No wound infection was reported in our series. CONCLUSION: Our series demonstrate the feasibility of utilising pre-designed cranioplasty for meningiomas and other tumours with osseous involvement. Following strict infection protocols, minimal intra-operative handling/modification of the implant, and close follow-up has resulted in good cosmetic outcomes with no implant-related infections.

Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series.

Introduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy around 1-2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about intracranial haemorrhages' temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommendations for duration of postoperative monitoring vary. Research question: To determine the rate, temporal pattern and clinical presentation of reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial posterior fossa haemorrhage. Material and methods: This retrospective case-series identified cases operated with posterior fossa craniotomy or craniectomy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021 by an electronic search in the patient administrative database, and collected data about patient- and treatment-characteristics, postoperative monitoring, and the occurrence of haemorrhagic and other serious postoperative complications. Results: We included 62 (n = 34, 55% women) cases with mean age 48 (interquartile range 50) years operated for tumours (n = 34, 55%), Chiari malformations (n = 18, 29%), ischemic stroke (n = 6, 10%) and other lesions (n = 3, 5%). One (2%) 66-year-old woman who was a daily smoker operated with decompressive craniectomy and infarct resection, developed a reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after 25.5 h. In four (6%) cases, other serious complications requiring reoperation or transfer from the post anaesthesia care unit or regular bed wards to the intensive care unit occurred after 0.5, 6, 9 and 54 h, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: Treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage and other serious complications after posterior fossa craniotomies occur over a wide timespan and are difficult to capture with a standardized postoperative monitoring time. This indicates that the duration of monitoring should be individualized based on assessment of risk factors.

Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants-what should automated methods strive to replicate?

PURPOSE: New deep learning and statistical shape modelling approaches aim to automate the design process for patient-specific cranial implants, as highlighted by the MICCAI AutoImplant Challenges. To ensure applicability, it is important to determine if the training data used in developing these algorithms represent the geometry of implants designed for clinical use. METHODS: Calavera Surgical Design provided a dataset of 206 post-craniectomy skull geometries and their clinically used implants. The MUG500+ dataset includes 29 post-craniectomy skull geometries and implants designed for automating design. For both implant and skull shapes, the inner and outer cortical surfaces were segmented, and the thickness between them was measured. For the implants, a 'rim' was defined that transitions from the repaired defect to the surrounding skull. For unilateral defect cases, skull implants were mirrored to the contra-lateral side and thickness differences were quantified. RESULTS: The average thickness of the clinically used implants was 6.0 ± 0.5 mm, which approximates the thickness on the contra-lateral side of the skull (relative difference of -0.3 ± 1.4 mm). The average thickness of the MUG500+ implants was 2.9 ± 1.0 mm, significantly thinner than the intact skull thickness (relative difference of 2.9 ± 1.2 mm). Rim transitions in the clinical implants (average width of 8.3 ± 3.4 mm) were used to cap and create a smooth boundary with the skull. CONCLUSIONS: For implant modelers or manufacturers, this shape analysis quantified differences of cranial implants (thickness, rim width, surface area, and volume) to help guide future automated design algorithms. After skull completion, a thicker implant can be more versatile for cases involving muscle hollowing or thin skulls, and wider rims can smooth over the defect margins to provide more stability. For clinicians, the differing measurements and implant designs can help inform the options available for their patient specific treatment.

Preoperative prescription opioid use as an independent predictor of 90-day mortality and adverse events in craniotomy and craniectomy patients.

OBJECTIVE: A growing body of literature suggests that preoperative opioid exposure is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in surgical patients. No outcomes data exist on preoperative opioid use and craniotomies/craniectomies. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative opioid use on 90-day adverse events after craniotomy or craniectomy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 2445 patients undergoing a craniotomy/craniectomy between January 1, 2013, and October 1, 2018, was conducted. Baseline demographics, pre- and postoperative opioid use (morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]), and surgical metrics were recorded. Patients were categorized based on whether they took prescription opioids preoperatively, defined as within 1 month of surgery, or were opioid naive. The outcomes were mortality and adverse events 90 days after craniotomy/craniectomy. RESULTS: Overall, 26.6% of patients composed the preoperative opioid group. The median daily MME intake among this group was 34.6 (IQR 14.1-90) MMEs. Lower employment rates (p < 0.001), uninsured status (p = 0.016), and intravenous drug use (p = 0.006) were associated with preoperative opioid use. Preoperative opioid use was associated with increased venous thromboembolism (p = 0.001), acute kidney injury (p = 0.002), acute respiratory failure (p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (p = 0.002), delirium (p < 0.001), and infection (p < 0.001). Preoperative opioid use was an independent predictor of overall 90-day adverse events (OR 1.643, 95% CI 1.289-2.095; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.690, 95% CI 1.254-2.277; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid use was independently associated with 90-day postoperative adverse events and mortality. Opioid use increases vulnerability in craniotomy/craniectomy patients and necessitates close monitoring to improve outcomes.

Perioperative risk factors for major complications after bone replacement in decompressive craniectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Bone flap replacement after a decompressive craniectomy is a low complexity procedure, but with complications that can negatively impact the patient's outcome. A better knowledge of the risk factors for these complications could reduce their incidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a series of 50 patients who underwent bone replacement after decompressive craniectomy at a tertiary center over a 10-year period was performed. Those clinical variables related to complications after replacement were recorded and their risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients (36%) presented complications after bone flap replacement, of which 10 (55.5%) required a new surgery for their treatment. Most of the replacements (95%) were performed in the first 90 days after the craniectomy, with a tendency to present more complications compared to the subsequent period (37.8% vs 20%, p > 0.05). The most frequent complication was subdural hygroma, which appeared later than infection, the second most frequent complication. The need for ventricular drainage or tracheostomy and the mean time on mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, or waiting until bone replacement were greater in patients who presented post-replacement complications. Previous infections outside the nervous system or the surgical wound was the only risk factor for post-bone flap replacement complications (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications were recorded in more than a third of the patients who underwent cranial bone flap replacement, and at least half of them required a new surgery. A specific protocol aimed at controlling previous infections could reduce the risk of complications and help establish the optimal time for cranial bone flap replacement.

Is cranioplasty the optimal treatment for contralateral subdural effusion after decompressive craniectomy?: a case report.

Introduction and importance: Contralateral subdural effusion (CSDE) is a rare complication secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC), which can lead to encephalocele and neurologic deterioration. The authors report a case that confirm the existence of unidirectional membrane valve, and cranioplasty is an effective treatment for CSDE. Case presentation: The authors reported a case of 43-year-old female was diagnosed with ruptured intracranial aneurysm and treated with interventional embolization. She underwent DC because of postoperative cerebral infarction subsequently. Her conscious state deteriorated accompanied by encephalocele in postoperative 2 week. A craniocerebral computed tomography (CT) confirmed the diagnosis of CSDE with cerebral hernia. A compression bandaging of the skull defect was applicated, whereas, her conscious state progressive deteriorated. She was transferred to the author's hospital where she underwent burr-hole drainage and clinical symptom has been improved. However, a relapse of CSDE was observed after the removal of drainage tube. Continuous lumbar drainage was employed, and which was ineffective for CSDE in this case. Finally, she underwent cranioplasty, with the help of drainage of subdural effusion, CSDE was completely resolved. Clinical discussion: CSDE is occasionally observed in patients after DC. Intracranial pressure (ICP) gradient and unidirectional membrane valve are the possible mechanisms of CSDE. At present, there is no optimal therapy for CSDE. For symptomatic CSDE patients, one or more treatment measures should be applicated. Conclusion: Cranioplasty is one of the curative and optimal method to treat symptomatic CSDE patients, early cranioplasty combined with burr-hole drainage should be performed for conservative treatment failed and intractable cases.

Functional outcome after late cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The best time for cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is controversial, and there are no authoritative guidelines yet. Both complications as well as outcome may depend on the timing of CP. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the impact of late CP on procedural safety as well as on patient outcome. METHODS: All patients receiving CP at a tertiary university medical center between 01/2015 and 12/2022 were included retrospectively. Patients' conditions were assessed according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) prior to CP and 6 months after. Baseline characteristics, indication for DC, time from DC to CP, and postoperative complications according to the Landriel Ibañez Classification were analyzed. RESULTS: CP was performed in 271 patients who previously underwent DC due to traumatic brain injury (25.5%), ischemic stroke (29.5%), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (26.9%), or intracerebral hemorrhage (18.1%). The median interval between DC and CP was 143 days (interquartile range 112-184 days). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a cut-off of 149 days, where CP performed within 149 days after DC led to an improvement on mRS after CP (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, additional rehabilitation after and better mRS before CP were independently associated with improvement of outcome. The rate of complications was similar between early and late CP (24.8% and 25.4%, respectively, p = 0.562). CONCLUSIONS: Late cranioplasty is a safe procedure. The outcome was improved when additional rehabilitation was performed after cranioplasty and was not associated with the timing of cranioplasty.

Surgical strategies in acute subdural hematoma: a meta-analysis of decompressive craniectomy vs. craniotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) stands as a significant contributor to morbidity after severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The primary treatment approach for patients experiencing progressive neurological deficits or notable mass effects is the surgical removal of the hematoma, which can be achieved through craniotomy (CO) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). Nevertheless, the choice between these two procedures remains a subject of ongoing debate and controversy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review, utilizing prominent online databases and manually searching references related to craniotomy and craniectomy for subdural hematoma evacuation up to November 2023. Our analysis focused on outcome variables such as the presence of residual subdural hematoma, the need for revision procedures, and overall clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included a total of 11 comparative studies in our analysis, encompassing 4269 patients, with 2979 undergoing craniotomy and 1290 undergoing craniectomy, meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent craniectomy displayed significantly lower scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) during their initial presentation. Following surgery, the DC group exhibited a significantly reduced rate of residual subdural (P = 0.009). Additionally, the likelihood of a poor outcome during follow-up was lower in the CO group. Likewise, the mortality rate was lower in the CO group compared to the craniectomy group (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98, I2 = 84%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study found that CO was associated with more favorable outcomes in terms of mortality, reoperation rate, and functional outcome while DC was associated with less likelihood of residual subdural hematoma. Upon further investigation of patient characteristics who underwent into either of these interventions, it was very clear that patients in DC cohort have more serious and low pre-op characteristics than the CO group. Nonetheless, brain herniation and advanced age act as independent factor for predicting the outcome irrespective of the intervention.

Health-related quality of life measures in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a 6-year follow-up analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the long-term neurological outcomes and the functionality and QoL in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the 120 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI between 2002 and 2007, 101 were included based on the inclusion criteria. Long-term follow-up results (minimum 3 years) were available for 22 patients. The outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the functionality and HRQoL were assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (v2) and Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QoLIBRI) questionnaires. RESULTS: Among the patients with severe TBI, 62 (61.4%) died and 39 (38.6%) were discharged to either home or a physical therapy facility. Eleven of the thirty-nine patients could not be reached and were excluded from the final analysis. The mean GOS of the remaining 28 patients was 4.14 ± 0.8 after 6.46 ± 1.64 years of follow-up. The HRQoL was assessed in 22 of the 28 patients. The HRQoL scores were lower in patients with TBI than in healthy controls. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the HRQoL scores in patients with improved GOS scores than in those with unimproved GOS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related outcome scores could help clinicians understand the requirements of survivors of severe TBI to create a realistic rehabilitation target for them. QoLIBRI served as a good way of communication in these subjects.

Correlation between Transcranial Ultrasound and CT Head to Detect Clinically Significant Conditions in Post-craniectomy Patients Performed by Emergency Physician: A Pilot Study.

Background: The main objective is to detect clinically significant conditions by transcranial ultrasound (TCS) in post-decompressive craniectomy (DC) patients who come to the emergency department. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study. We studied 40 post-DC patients. After primary stabilization, TCS was done. Computer tomography of head was done within 2 hours of performing TCS. The correlation between both modalities were assessed by the measurement of lateral ventricle (LV) (Bland-Altman plot), Midline shift and mass lesion. Additionally, normal cerebral anatomy, 3rd and 4th ventricles and external ventricular drainage (EVD) catheter visualization were also done. Results: About 14/40 patients came with non-neurosurgical complaints and 26/40 patients came with neurosurgical complaints. Patients with non-neurosurgical complaints (4/14) had mass lesions and 1/14 had MLS. Patients with neurosurgical complaints (11/26) had mass lesions and about 5 patients had MLS. A good correlation was found between TCS and CT of head in measuring LV right (CT head = 17.4 ± 13.8 mm and TCS = 17.1 ± 14.8 mm. The mean difference (95% CI) = [0.28 (-1.9 to 1.33), ICC 0.93 (0.88-0.96)], Left [CT head = 17.8 ± 14.4 mm and TCS = 17.1 ± 14.2 mm, the mean difference (95% CI) 0.63 (-1.8 to 0.61), ICC 0.96 (0.93-0.98)], MLS [CT head = 6.16 ± 3.59 (n = 7) and TCS = 7.883 ± 4.17 (n = 6)] and mass lesions (kappa 0.84 [0.72-0.89] [95% CI] p-value < 0.001). The agreement between both modalities for detecting mass lesions is 93.75%. Conclusion: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a bedside, easily operable, non-radiation hazard and dynamic imaging tool that can be used for TCS as a supplement to CT head in post-DC patients in emergency as well as in ICU. However, assessment of the ventricular system (pre/post-EVD insertion), monitoring of regression/progression of mass lesion, etc. can be done with TCS. Repeated scans are possible in less time which can decrease the frequency of CT head. How to cite this article: Chouhan R, Sinha TP, Bhoi S, Kumar A, Agrawal D, Nayer J, et al. Correlation between Transcranial Ultrasound and CT Head to Detect Clinically Significant Conditions in Post-craniectomy Patients Performed by Emergency Physician: A Pilot Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):299-306.